« Standard Bank needs a disaster recovery plan | Main | Tiger's apology doesn't jive »
Thursday, 24 December 2009
My Christmas '09 thought for you
The comments to this entry are closed.
My Other Accounts
Categories
- Attitude
- Books
- Business efficiency
- Business ethics
- Change
- Child abuse
- China
- Christmas
- Communication
- Culture Differences
- Current Affairs
- Customer care
- DVDs and Movies
- EQ
- Experiential learning
- Food and Drink
- Friday Fluster
- Fun
- Games
- Image
- Internet
- Leadership
- Listening
- Marketing
- Media Censorship
- Mind Management
- Onion of the week award
- Orchid of the week
- Osteoporosis
- Personal development
- Politics
- Professional Speakers
- Public Relations
- Religion
- Reputation Management
- reputation management
- Rest & recreation
- Science
- Social Media
- SpeakZA
- Spirituality
- Sports
- Television
- Tiger Woods 'apology'
- Untermenschen
- Web/Tech
- Writing
- Xenophobia
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- You’re possibly being rude and wasteful without realising it.
- Rape is Rape. Abuse is abuse. Don't confuse kids with candy-coating.
- If I were Pope Francis, here's some of what I'd do
- Rogue South African cops - how do we fix it?
- The ugliness spawned by social media
- Justin Bieber is having meltdowns? Your brand may need one, too.
- My interview on the Marikana
- Branding and Marketing YOU - a new book by Donna Rachelson
- Let’s have a look at you
- Your company may *have* to use social media
Recent Comments
- de Wet Vorster on Rogue South African cops - how do we fix it?
- Ms de Almeida on LG South Africa's utterly crap service
- Hector Hereter on Criticism and self-esteem
- Patrick Leclezio on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
- brenda karibeti on Dances with Devils - by Jacques Pauw
- Fellow Animal Lover on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
- Matty on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
- Maryke on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
- Ralene Perez Basson on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
- Annie on Flame Pam Whyte for her pseudo 'science'
Comments